廢除「比較文學」和「文化研究」學門芻議
今天一邊吃飯一邊跟朋友們聊到的，既然otaku們分析動漫作品，都能用上詮釋學、現象學、心理分析，而引用的經典，又上自托拉、死海書卷，下至福音書、偽經，採用的方法，更是從新批評、作者論、讀者反應理論、解構主義到鄉民推文，請問「比較文學」和「文化研究」還有什麼能立於學院的？
（逃）
lukhnos :: Aug.04.2006 :: litteris 字與詞 :: 5 Comments »
5 Responses to “廢除「比較文學」和「文化研究」學門芻議”
Because, for example, if you have a department called “history of consciousness\” (google it, you will find one– at least), your students will not find jobs because hiring committees of various universities have hard time figuring out if candidates from the said department do psychology, history, philosophy, or cultural studies. Or, why not try an innovative title like “Department of Science of Texts and Documents?? I’d like to study there but I wonder what it does to my job interviews. Hence, “comparative literature? (you may bracket it if you like).
因為其實 學院=otaku 1.0 或 otaku=學院 2.0 。
wahahhahahahahah, rofl
它們給了這些行為一個名詞啊，正當化了此種行為的存在。
Actually, I would like to study at “history of consciousness”.